Generic Dating vs Plenty of Fish
Generic Dating (9.1/10) comes out ahead of Plenty of Fish (7.3/10) overall, mainly on discretion and safety. Go Generic Dating if you want discretion and safety; pick Plenty of Fish if the biggest, busiest crowd matters more to you.
Our pick 
Generic Dating
9.1/ 10
Safety
9.2
Value
8.8
Crowd
9.0
Ease
9.6
WannaHookup earns its keep on ease of use and a low-risk free tier, and it is honest about being a fast, casual, US-focused hookup site rather than a relationship platform. My scores lean positive on onboarding and safety and land mid-pack on value, because the credit-based messaging model means your real cost depends entirely on how much you talk. Treat the free account as your audition: browse, gauge whether the local pool is worth it, and only then buy a small credit pack as a paid trial. If you want no-strings casual and prize a clean, simple experience, it is a reasonable pick. If you want a flat subscription, a serious match, or a big international audience, look elsewhere. Full disclosure: every site we list is monetized, including this one. What we do not sell is placement or ranking order, that stays editorial.
- +Genuinely easy sign-up and navigation, one of the smoother onboarding flows in the casual category
- +Free tier lets you browse and assess the local pool before spending a cent
- +Clear casual, no-strings positioning, so expectations are set honestly up front
Plenty of Fish
7.3/ 10
Safety
6.2
Value
7.8
Crowd
8.2
Ease
7.4
The generous old-timer, 7.3/10 (safety 6.2, value 7.8, members 8.2, ease 7.4; weighted safety 30%, value 30%, members 20%, ease 20%). POF wins on the one thing that matters most to a lot of people: a huge pool you can actually message for free, no paywall, no match required. It loses points for a dated, ad-heavy experience and a real bot-and-scam problem you have to filter yourself. We earn no commission on this one, it's listed purely on merit. Ride the free tier, vet everyone hard, watch for anyone pushing you to WhatsApp, and you've got serious dating value for nothing.
- +Genuinely free messaging, you can write to anyone with no match and no paywall, which almost no rival allows
- +One of the biggest pools in dating after 20+ years, skewing older and more everyday than the swipe apps
- +Free tier is properly usable end-to-end; many users land dates without ever paying
Side-by-side comparison
| Generic Dating | Plenty of Fish | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 9.1✓ | 7.3 |
| Safety | 9.2✓ | 6.2 |
| Value | 8.8✓ | 7.8 |
| Crowd | 9.0✓ | 8.2 |
| Ease | 9.6✓ | 7.4 |
| Free to join | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Fast, no-strings casual dating | Free messaging, big pool, casual + dating |
Which should you pick?
Generic Dating
Pick Generic Dating if discretion and safety is your priority.
Plenty of Fish
Pick Plenty of Fish if the biggest, busiest crowd matters more to you.
Generic Dating vs Plenty of Fish, common questions
Is Generic Dating better than Plenty of Fish?
Overall, Generic Dating comes out ahead (9.1 vs 7.3). But "better" depends on what you want, the table above breaks it down dimension by dimension.
Which is safer and more discreet?
Generic Dating, scoring 9.2 on safety versus 6.2.
Which is better value for money?
Generic Dating, 8.8 on value versus 7.8.
Which has the bigger crowd?
Generic Dating, scoring 9.0 on crowd size and activity versus 8.2.
Affiliate links, placement is never for sale.